1. Are you listening?
Not at all.
2. Can you just hold on to this tape for a second?
No, my hands are full.
3. OK, can you just pass me that bag?
Sure. It's heavy, though, with fifty-eight soldier corpses, 50 potions of holy water, 32 K-rations, and a partridge in a pair of pants.
4. Do you think William Godwin is an actual forerunner of modern (20th
century) anarchist movements, or do his writings more accurately reflect
a facet of religious communalism as supposedly typified by the early
Christians? Discuss.
I think that Godwin argued that government is a corrupting force in society, perpetuating dependence and ignorance, but that it will be rendered increasingly unnecessary and powerless by the gradual spread of knowledge. Politics will be displaced by an enlarged personal morality as truth conquers error and mind subordinates matter. In this development the rigorous exercise of private judgment, and its candid expression in public discussion, plays a central role, motivating his rejection of a wide range of co- operative and rule-governed practices which he regards as tending to mental enslavement, such as law, private property, marriage and concerts. Epitomising the optimism of events in France at the time he began writing, Godwin looked forward to a period in which the dominance of mind over matter would be so complete that mental perfectibility would take a physical form, allowing us to control illness and ageing and become immortal.
5. What the hell is up with you people?
We can't answer any question without reference to Google.