posted by ![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
damerell at 08:06pm on 26/10/2012
damerell at 08:06pm on 26/10/2012Dear organisations collecting money from me,
Which of these serves better as a "security check" - the first line of my address (that anyone with a phone book can discover), the customer/membership number printed only on your correspondence to me, or the amount that I owe you, printed only on one specific piece of correspondence? Which serves worst?
Why would I care if you didn't carry out this (bogus) check and allowed someone else to pay money towards my bill, provided that you don't disclose the amount of said bill? Please. Let them do it.
Why are you fobbing me off with nonsense about the Data Protection Act? There isn't a data protection issue here unless the mystery caller (who knows my customer number) asks you to disclose some facts about me.
No love,
David.
Which of these serves better as a "security check" - the first line of my address (that anyone with a phone book can discover), the customer/membership number printed only on your correspondence to me, or the amount that I owe you, printed only on one specific piece of correspondence? Which serves worst?
Why would I care if you didn't carry out this (bogus) check and allowed someone else to pay money towards my bill, provided that you don't disclose the amount of said bill? Please. Let them do it.
Why are you fobbing me off with nonsense about the Data Protection Act? There isn't a data protection issue here unless the mystery caller (who knows my customer number) asks you to disclose some facts about me.
No love,
David.
There are 2 comments on this entry.