posted by
damerell at 02:56pm on 28/07/2019
"Mishima activates her crowdcutter and it springs from its microcrimped home in the clasps on her dress, a transparent vinyl shell shaped like a shark fin that lets her scythe through the mass of people glomming toward the sign."
Dear author, you have just aimed for cool cyberpunk gadgetry, tripped over your own feet, and landed face-first in the cowpat of utter absurdity; and you have done it in the first chapter, which is not a good start.
What crowd lets you push through it because you're cosplaying as an icebreaker, rather than telling you to fuck off? The thing must have significant structural integrity, and it's not made of gizmodium, so she's been lugging around several kilos of spring-loaded vinyl (which must have to be properly anchored to her, so she's also in some sort of harness) on the off-chance that this specific problem arises, like James Bond if Q was precognitive [1]. Does her dress sometimes go BDOIOIOING unexpectedly? Is she some kind of Swiss Army Knife of unfolding vinyl devices, like a po-faced Inspector Gadget?
More seriously I've just given up on the book because - well, because _Too Like the Lightning_ reminded me that it is not worth finishing a book that makes me go "aaargh, shut up, author" every four pages. Here we are being beaten vigorously with the exposition stick at every opportunity; the author makes a particularly bold move in writing "the rush of exposition in the airport comes as a shock, especially on such little sleep" as a precursor to delivering the lump of exposition, not that it is greatly distinguished from the exposition that surrounds it. Come back, Becky Chambers' "describe the ships to me like I am a child", all is forgiven.
"JaBoDeTaBekBan, the urban conglomeration with Jakarta at its heart, has" a fucking implausible name, like I don't think anyone goes around gobbing up that mouthful on a regular basis, and that's about as far as I got.
As a result, my final objection might be wrong, because there may well be another lump of exposition coming, but it looks to me like the world is sorted into tens of thousands of, well, constituencies each of which elect a single political party on a FPTP basis, and there's a rich tapestry of dozens of political parties; now, one of the many odd things about FPTP is it tends to encourage political parties to agglomerate into vast blobs, so how's that work?
This was my first novel-length No Award this year.
[1] indeed, in IIRC Goldeneye Bond's car has a popup attachment for cutting cables strung across the road at a highly specific height, and sportingly the bad guys string a cable across the road at just that height.
Dear author, you have just aimed for cool cyberpunk gadgetry, tripped over your own feet, and landed face-first in the cowpat of utter absurdity; and you have done it in the first chapter, which is not a good start.
What crowd lets you push through it because you're cosplaying as an icebreaker, rather than telling you to fuck off? The thing must have significant structural integrity, and it's not made of gizmodium, so she's been lugging around several kilos of spring-loaded vinyl (which must have to be properly anchored to her, so she's also in some sort of harness) on the off-chance that this specific problem arises, like James Bond if Q was precognitive [1]. Does her dress sometimes go BDOIOIOING unexpectedly? Is she some kind of Swiss Army Knife of unfolding vinyl devices, like a po-faced Inspector Gadget?
More seriously I've just given up on the book because - well, because _Too Like the Lightning_ reminded me that it is not worth finishing a book that makes me go "aaargh, shut up, author" every four pages. Here we are being beaten vigorously with the exposition stick at every opportunity; the author makes a particularly bold move in writing "the rush of exposition in the airport comes as a shock, especially on such little sleep" as a precursor to delivering the lump of exposition, not that it is greatly distinguished from the exposition that surrounds it. Come back, Becky Chambers' "describe the ships to me like I am a child", all is forgiven.
"JaBoDeTaBekBan, the urban conglomeration with Jakarta at its heart, has" a fucking implausible name, like I don't think anyone goes around gobbing up that mouthful on a regular basis, and that's about as far as I got.
As a result, my final objection might be wrong, because there may well be another lump of exposition coming, but it looks to me like the world is sorted into tens of thousands of, well, constituencies each of which elect a single political party on a FPTP basis, and there's a rich tapestry of dozens of political parties; now, one of the many odd things about FPTP is it tends to encourage political parties to agglomerate into vast blobs, so how's that work?
This was my first novel-length No Award this year.
[1] indeed, in IIRC Goldeneye Bond's car has a popup attachment for cutting cables strung across the road at a highly specific height, and sportingly the bad guys string a cable across the road at just that height.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(One could imagine that there's some kind of deterministic algorithm that does it based on voters' registered addresses... but curiously, all the exposition doesn't seem to have got to that bit.)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Have read the second book. Will resentfully read the plot summaries of books 3 & 4, I suspect.)
(no subject)
a) the correct way to do a multiple volume story is to bring each book to a satisfying conclusion, perhaps by wrapping up some subplots, not to give us the impression that you ran out of typewriter ribbon and decided you might as well stop there.
b) the two main subplots for the first book are a child who can work literal miracles... and that someone has slightly meddled with the equivalent of the Sunday Times Rich List, which everyone in the world is obsessed with for no readily apparent reason. One of these things is not like the other.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
I think my opinion of Adam Roberts’ SF criticism is somewhat clouded by my opinion of his SF (which is essentially ”it’s OK, I guess, but it does feel a bit like those SF books that ‘literary’ writers occasionally do without bothering to inform themselves about the field of existing SF”).
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
I am broadly happy to have consumed these as Easy Reads, because it is at least worldbuilding I'm contented to sleepily poke holes in, but it is not necessarily... deeply edifying. ;)