(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com at 07:55pm on 24/11/2006
Interesting. You're the first commenter, actually, I'll see how it goes.

I note that no-one gets uptight about the Africa restriction being racist, even though I imagine it affects black people far more than others.
[parent entry] [link] [parent] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_nicolai_/ at 12:36am on 25/11/2006
As to "Racist", well, sometimes reality and skin colour coincide. Correlation does not imply causality.
[link] [parent] [reply]
ext_3375: Banded Tussock (Default)

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] hairyears.livejournal.com at 03:51pm on 25/11/2006
Not quite: sex tourists tend to be white. However, they are definitely not all male: West Africa (Gambia in particular) is a popular destination for unaccompanied middle-aged women.
[link] [parent] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] spaglet.livejournal.com at 03:05pm on 26/11/2006
They get uptight about this one, perhaps, because it is assumed that the HIV test is wholly reliable, with possibly the only variable being the window of infection versus test. I would also question whether the other restrictions are as widely known as this one.

Besides, if white, searching under the street lights is easy. Statistics are always useful.
[link] [parent] [reply]

April

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
    1
 
 2
 
 3
 
 4
 
 5
 
6
 
 7
 
 8
 
 9
 
 10
1
 11
 
 12
 
13
 
 14
1
 15
 
 16
 
 17
 
 18
 
 19
 
20
 
 21
 
 22
 
 23
 
 24
 
 25
 
 26
 
27
 
 28
 
 29
 
 30