lnr: Halloween 2023 (Default)
posted by [personal profile] lnr at 04:32pm on 26/11/2006
What I worry about are the people who decide they are low risk and lie to give blood, because they think that's more important than the rules. And I think the oral sex prohibition is a bit odd too, since as far as I'm aware that's extremely low risk. While the risk of contracting HIV is higher, and yes it might miss the screening, I do wonder why these people are banned for life, when women who are sleeping with them are only banned for a year after they stop. I wonder if it would be possible to give a similar or possibly longer period of time after people have stopped taking part in risky activities.

I note I signed this petition, but not as a result of seeing an LJ meme encouraging me to do so. In fact this is the first I heard of any such meme.

I will admit that I might not have signed it if I had stopped to think about it in complete detail, because I think it was written quite badly. I think the petition site is possibly dangerous in this regard, because you tend to scan down the list and look at all the ones that seem like even vaguely a good idea.

I would like to know that they do review the policy regularly though, and make sure it is statistically still the most sensible one.
 
posted by [identity profile] dennyd.livejournal.com at 06:31pm on 21/11/2007
I would like to know that they do review the policy regularly though, and make sure it is statistically still the most sensible one.

http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2006-03-08c.53528.h

April

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
    1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10 11
 
12
 
13
 
14 15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30