posted by [identity profile] rax.livejournal.com at 07:06pm on 25/09/2007
I am _certain_ my folding bike would fall apart at 36mph. I might have to make the next one Brompton; I had a coworker who very much liked his as well.

...and if you were hitting 36mph on a Brompton, you intended to take a fixie on this course? Are you mad, or just hardcore?
pm215: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] pm215 at 10:12pm on 25/09/2007
I've done nearly 40mph on my Raleigh Twenty and it didn't fall apart, fold up or fail to brake on demand :-)
 
posted by [identity profile] rax.livejournal.com at 10:28pm on 25/09/2007
Mine is an old Dahon. It's... rickety. I've managed to get the seat to stop falling down while I ride it! :)
 
posted by [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com at 12:42am on 26/09/2007
The Brompton isn't really an alternative to the Dahon. As you know, folding bikes compromise a few factors - folded size, ease of fold, ride quality, cheapness and crapness of design. The B is quite small when folded, folds in 15 seconds (no, really) - it is only because it is very well designed that the ride quality is acceptable.

It's not the same job as "slow to fold, rides something like a non-folding bike".

England has a really unusual propensity to short sharp climbs compared to most places (Scotland is much more "normal" with long slow ascents) and that means short fast descents. I would expect to get to around 35mph at least once on any reasonable length country ride - if you ride fixed over here, you just have to be able to do 120rpm and brake a bit...
 
posted by [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com at 12:43am on 26/09/2007
British bicycles of that vintage have a number of oddities but a tendency to disintegrate unexpectedly isn't really one of them. :-)

April

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
    1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10 11
 
12
 
13
 
14 15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30