damerell: NetHack. (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] damerell at 01:51am on 12/08/2003
I've done 39, I'm wondering if I should be trying to solve the final level or prove it insoluble, and I just got a subtle hint. Time to call it a night.
There are 18 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
lnr: Halloween 2023 (Default)
posted by [personal profile] lnr at 02:03am on 12/08/2003
Gah, can't remember how far I got in the end.
 
posted by [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com at 06:44am on 12/08/2003
I can't see that anyone I know has definitely done #40. I'm not convinced it's impossible, but I think trying to prove it so might be the best line of attack on the solution.
lnr: Halloween 2023 (Default)
posted by [personal profile] lnr at 10:15am on 12/08/2003
I was expecting something exciting to happen:

http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~eleanorb/temp/Image1.png

Is level 36 *supposed* to have a cheating loose piece in though?
 
posted by [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com at 10:18am on 12/08/2003
I guess that's an implicit "level 40 is possible", although I still suspect trying to prove otherwise would be a viable line of attack. Beat me to it, you mathmo, you. :-)

Level 36 can be done without using the loose piece's looseness.
lnr: Halloween 2023 (Default)
posted by [personal profile] lnr at 03:37pm on 12/08/2003
Yes, it is indeed possible, no I didn't do it at all methodically, so I haven't a clue how it was actually done, or indeed any idea how to prove it can't be. I hate trying to prove things I already know to be false anyway.

And you're right, 36 is do-able without cheating. Bit of a nuisance having to do 1-35 again to prove it to myself though :-)
 
posted by [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com at 05:21am on 13/08/2003
I'm starting to suspect that as I finished 39 and started 40 lack of sleep caught up with me in a big way, and it's not actually that hard.

[Doing 1-35 again - why not just use the "skip to level n" thing in the options?
]
lnr: Halloween 2023 (Default)
posted by [personal profile] lnr at 03:10am on 14/08/2003
I thought that only worked if you'd done the levels already? And how do I convince a completely different machine at home that I've done them already on the desktop at work?
 
posted by [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com at 04:20am on 14/08/2003
Oh, right. Being Captain Apathy I'd have waited until I got back to the other machine.
reddragdiva: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] reddragdiva at 07:16am on 12/08/2003
This thing is eating my brane. Currently stuck on 11.
lnr: Halloween 2023 (Default)
posted by [personal profile] lnr at 08:12am on 12/08/2003
Someone remind me where it is?
 
posted by [identity profile] gnimmel.livejournal.com at 10:01am on 16/08/2003
Evil, evil, evil. There goes (or rather, went) a chunk of my time
:)
[and fwiw, I got to a point in 40 where reasoning didn't seem to be working, so I just started making random moves. 10 or so random moves later it was solved....]
 
posted by [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com at 08:31am on 12/08/2003
By and large they don't seem _too_ bad, but the last one's a real stinker.
lnr: Halloween 2023 (Default)
posted by [personal profile] lnr at 02:14pm on 12/08/2003
It's definitely much easier coming back to it after having done it before. I've not been trying to do it in minimal moves, just to get it done, and it only took me an hour or so to whizz through the whole lot this afternoon.

I generally just move things around a bit, look at what's still in the way, think about what needs to move in order to move it, look at what gaps there are I can shove things in, then shuffle some more. And usually it all falls out pretty quickly.
 
posted by [identity profile] vyvyan.livejournal.com at 04:40pm on 12/08/2003
Oh, this is the computer version of Rush Hour, isn't it? I've got the physical version and a couple of expansions. Original 40 were not too hard (don't remember finding no. 40 particularly difficult, but a couple of the others stumped me for a while). The expansion packs have some extra-hard levels though; haven't got round to doing them all yet.

Games and Puzzles have a number of (non-computerised) games of this type; they seem very popular.
 
posted by [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com at 05:22am on 13/08/2003
I wonder if an extra-hard level really is; a useful angle of attack on some of the ones other people found hard - as with some "hard" Sokoban levels - is to notice that only one move does anything useful at all, rinse, and repeat.
 
posted by [identity profile] nathaniel412.livejournal.com at 07:54am on 09/12/2003
I just beat level 40 (yeah I know, who the hell am I, but I found this link on google when seeing if level 40 was winnable) and wanted to show you all how to beat it... or at least what it should look like to beat it..

http://www.avalon.net/~matrix/level40.jpg

 
posted by [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com at 08:39am on 12/12/2003
Oh, I'm sure it's possible; I was just considering the idea that a good way to find the solution would be to try to prove there wasn't one, which is often an effective technique.

April

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
    1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10 11
 
12
 
13
 
14 15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30