I guess that's an implicit "level 40 is possible", although I still suspect trying to prove otherwise would be a viable line of attack. Beat me to it, you mathmo, you. :-)
Level 36 can be done without using the loose piece's looseness.
Yes, it is indeed possible, no I didn't do it at all methodically, so I haven't a clue how it was actually done, or indeed any idea how to prove it can't be. I hate trying to prove things I already know to be false anyway.
And you're right, 36 is do-able without cheating. Bit of a nuisance having to do 1-35 again to prove it to myself though :-)
I thought that only worked if you'd done the levels already? And how do I convince a completely different machine at home that I've done them already on the desktop at work?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~eleanorb/temp/Image1.png
Is level 36 *supposed* to have a cheating loose piece in though?
(no subject)
Level 36 can be done without using the loose piece's looseness.
(no subject)
And you're right, 36 is do-able without cheating. Bit of a nuisance having to do 1-35 again to prove it to myself though :-)
(no subject)
[Doing 1-35 again - why not just use the "skip to level n" thing in the options?
]
(no subject)
(no subject)