fanf: (Default)

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] fanf at 07:20pm on 17/10/2006
It would be nice if Dawkins was less erratic in his arguments.
http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=7803
[parent entry] [link] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com at 04:40pm on 18/10/2006
I'm less than convinced. Sure, Dawkins is absurdly optimistic in asserting atheism never provides the motive; but, if I can employ the "it's politics, not religion" defence so beloved of the theists, I don't suppose Tibet being a secular democracy would have made a blind bit of difference, for example.
[link] [parent] [reply]

April

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
    1
 
 2
 
 3
 
 4
 
 5
 
6
 
 7
 
 8
 
 9
 
 10
1
 11
 
 12
 
13
 
 14
1
 15
 
 16
 
 17
 
 18
 
 19
 
20
 
 21
 
 22
 
 23
 
 24
 
 25
 
 26
 
27
 
 28
 
 29
 
 30